One Person One Stroke Finished Product

Ta Daaaaaaaa Here's the finished painting.

It is safe to say that every one of us had a Great time and new gained confidence.

We learned that we need to go over the painting many times, and that it is an evolving process. We were faced with a "boo boo" when the left support of the bridge was deemed out of scale and had the wrong orientation.

What did we do? We extended the foliage to cover the "boo boo" and this is a hands-on experience that is invaluable.

We retained the original title of the painting, but in place of the poem that was on the original work, we had everybody sign their names.

The following link lets you see some of the highlights of the event

http://gallery.me.com/akwan#100012

Rice Fields finished product ?

Received word from Portland Open Studios that I am " IN " this year, suffice to say, I am elated. Went through my pile of paper on the floor, picking projects that are half done and see which one might have potentials to be Open Studios material.



Back to the Rice Fields again. Like any good Chinese Brush Painting student, I finished composing my work, did the necessary "chuen", laid down my shading with light ink etc. We were taught that coloring does not make your painting "better", it merely brings into life what we have laid down on paper. In other words, everything needs to be finished first, and coloring is the last step.

After several layers of colors and washing, I ended up with the painting on top. I must say that I did not like it at all. I have tried to soften the roofs by applying a dark plum color to it, using side tip brushing. This did make the roofs less "harsh", less "rigid", but the entire housing compound seemed totally detached from the painting. It lacked "connection", it did not belong. I looked like an island in the sea. The trees and shrubs/woods at the bottom of the painting look like two flat ribbons. The rigid lines at the lower left corner of the housing compound looked out of place, and wanted to lead you away from the painting; a most uncomfortable feeling. Perhaps the corner is too harsh?

I let the painting dry and looked at it for a whole afternoon, thinking. Trying to understand what I have put down on paper. It finally dawned on me that I was too busy recording, and forgot about creating.

I started to back lit the trees, because light is coming from behind the paper.

I high lighted the shrubs and trees into distinct clumps to add dimension and shape to the "flat ribbons". I re dotted the dark areas with ink and dark plum ( I love using dark plum color; it helps to transition between dark and light areas ) to make the high lights work. All of a sudden the foreground looked a lot more interesting. The void on the lower edge of the painting was meant to be just voids, because I did not apply color there. But because of the color

bleed from applying the dark plum and green pigments, the bottom "void" took on a feel of a glassy surface of a pond. So I added a reflection of the tree on the right, to make it look like a pond.

This was a happy coincidence. The pond was not in my original thoughts. It just happened, and I think it added a lot to the painting. Now I have a foreground, the edge of the pond, then the commune, then the fields, then the distant hills, then the smoggy skies. All of a sudden, everything seemed "connected" I also softened the lower left "corner" by adding a couple of trees on site and by laying down reflections of the houses on the flooded fields. I also darkened the lower fields and gave the entire painting a green wash to integrate the colors.

Doesn't the painting look a lot better now?

Rice Fields

Bought some new paper lately, Korean Hemp Paper and I've been itching to try this out.

The paper is very unlike the Xuan paper in that it behaves almost like sized paper. Has a waxy feel to it and does not absorb water readily. I found that out when I splash some brush washing water on the paper ( my bad habit) and I was able to blot it up.

I wanted to paint the rice fields in China, flooded with water and surrounded by columnous hills that are quite characteristic of the southwestern part of China and Vietnam. I also had photos as references for this endeavour.


The composition is not your typical Chinese painting with the scattered focal points. My painting here has a vanishing point, definitely speaks of the western genre. I wanted to have a play of light values, by showing the reflections of the distant hills in the flooded rice fields, such that the massive fields behaves almost like water surface. I wanted the geometric array of roofs of the village commune to be contrasting with the strange looking hills in the background.

I painted the distant hills with wet wash, and when they are almost dry, I went over the contour with darker ink. The ink diffuses out and gives one the effect of vegetation. If I was to add silhouettes of trees etc on the hills, they would look too deliberate, and takes away the Xieyi feel of the painting. The fatal mistake I made in this painting is that I was " filling in " the roofs with concentrated ink, almost like painting by the numbers. Whereas this looks neat an tidy, but is totally devoid of any artistic feel to it. This is what happens when we use a 2 dimensional photograph as reference. Somehow we still need to portray a 3 dimensional look. I've often talk to other beginners about the shortcomings of looking too closely at a photograph, and this is a good example of what NOT TO DO. We need to be able to digest the image and translate into our own interpretation.

Two Ancient Pieces

I took one of my finished works to Hong Kong for mounting. Our local craftsman here lack the skill in silk mounting. Just got this back in the mail and I was so excited that I had to post this right away. Showed a head shot to reveal the size of this painting.



This piece of work is suppose to emulate the old classic style of Chinese Brush painting. The emphasis is with the lines, with scant use of color. My theory is that in the old days, illumination


is not great in a typical Chinese dwelling, even during daytime. So color scheme is simple and sparingly used. Artists showed their craft by displaying superb line qualities. Moist vs. dry, side tip, straight tip, fleeting strokes and hesitations are all used in a harmonious way to illustrate the aesthetic qualities of the painting. The "chuen" ( rubbing technique) is typically the "hemp" style, i.e. ala hemp fibres.

The land masses on the left has totally different characteristics from the right. The left is of multi-lobed hills, so the " hemp chuen" is used to define the quality of the slopes, the convolutions of the hills. The "hemp chuen" gives a rounded, definitely not jagged feel to the land features. The right hand side speaks of drama. Bold, protruding granites form the main features. Here the "chuen" is more of the "axe" type. Bold, discrete side-tips with lifts to give the harsh texture. Of course shading adds to the strong 3-D feel of features to the entire land mass.



The left and right is joined by a transitional spit, via a bridge. The willows on the spit bends to the right, answering to the left bending willows on the right side of the painting. Water space is left blank, with a very faint hint of the same brown color of the hills (integrating the overall color scheme of the painting)



This painting failed in the sense that the color was too heavy and too bright. I would have preferred a more subdued hue, especially that awful green with the willows. The mountain streams should be left with just a hint of color. The plateau on the left, behind the ridges is showing the wrong perspective..... showing too much of the top. The shore line on the right scurries upwards instead of staying at horizontal...... I must be tired.



Well, these are areas that I need to correct, if I have to redo this painting. I actually have sized another length of paper and I wanted to paint this again on sized paper, to see if the sized paper would give the painting a less saturated look, therefore coming closer to the "antique" feel of the painting.

ONE PERSON ONE STROKE PROJECT

On April 18th, I shall entice a bunch of Chinese Brush Painting enthusiasts to embark on a group project. I shall name this project One Person One Stroke. These people love the art of Chinese Brush Painting, but feel shy about painting anything of substance. I suggested this concept of a group painting. We shall each take our turn to lay down a few strokes, thus none of us would have to bear the entire cross. I wanted us to copy some one's work to begin with., working with a template, if you wish. I wanted our group to understand what the painting is about and why are certain things done the way they were. For without comprehending the meaning of the painting, then our copying would be in vain; we would not learn anything from our people's work.

This piece of work is loosely translated as Night Anchor by the Maple Bridge. The Maple and the bridge is self evident. The maple is done with the "dotting" technique and is ideal for a group of 12 to 15 people, for each of us would have ample opportunity for "dotting". The dotting involves different ink tones, and different color hues, would be interesting to see how it progresses.

The bridge seemed simple, yet is difficult to master. First of all, the aesthetic proportions of the structure is difficult to achieve. If one magnifies the image, one would see that the lines are not solid, continuous lines. They are undulating, broken lines. Solid, continuous lines lack character, and look stagnant, as if they are formed by moulding. Chinese Brush Painting is all about the quality of the lines, so this is something we need to address.

Where does the " night " scene come from?? From the reflection of the moon in the water. By painting the moon as a reflection in the water, the artist makes the audience think, therebyentertains the notion that this night scene is more poetic. It can also be said that if the moon was in the sky, then the upper portion of the painting might be darker, and creates a sense of heavy on the top, not a virtue of a good painting.

Anchor is evidenced by the 2 boats that are tied up by the bridge, only half exposed.... adding to the security that these boat owners must have sought. Anchor can also be evidenced euphemistically by the birds that are resting at the tree branches on the right.

The maple trees are not all solid with dotted leaves, but spaces between branches are quite evident. This is what is known as "breathing" in Chinese Brush Painting.

The reflection of the bridge in the water is handled in a very low key fashion... barely a hint. It just adds to the dreaminess of the work, and harks a nocturnal theme.

I am really looking forward to the finished product, painted by a group of students, many of us are novices. I shall post the finished painting when we have it.